Queen of Candesce, by Karl Schroeder
The Neddiad, by Daniel Pinkwater
Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, by Douglas R. Hofstadter
Gofun-go no Sekai, by Ryu Murakami
1Q84, by Haruki Murakami
More music soon, I hope, when things stop getting in the way.
1 day ago on July 5th, 2009 at 1:32 am | Permalink
I think Propellerheads protest far too much about the usability problems with most DAWs. In fact, the interface for Record looks like a lot more clutter than I’m used to in Logic, as others have noted already. I used Reason for quite a while and liked it, but I did find its interface inflexible in some ways, notably its vertical tallness; with wider screens becoming the norm I often found myself wanting a double-width rack instead of just the single column. Record looks like a step backward in terms of clutter. For one thing, if its mixing desk is always that size it would drive me batshit. I barely use Logic’s mixer; I find myself tweaking levels, panning and effects by track rather than messing with multiple tracks at once.
The timestretching is useful, yes, but the comping feature (for putting together vocal takes etc.) doesn’t seem to me to be very different from the way that Logic does it.
And what this bullshit is about it not being a DAW, I have no idea. I can see the distinction they’re trying to make, but it amounts to little more than spin in the real world. It comes across as an attempt to avoid disadvantageous comparisons with competing products.
None of which goes to say that I wouldn’t give it and Reason a go again; in fact, I’d been dithering about upgrading to Reason 4 recently anyway, the ability to use effects like the Scream on audio, and the modular tricks you can do in Reason using Combinators and chained effects would also be interesting.
But the closed nature of the system turns me off somewhat. Having to run three applications (Record, Reason and Logic) just to use an AU plugin on one channel strikes me as utterly absurd. And I think by delaying the addition of audio recording to Reason for so long they may have talked themselves into over-egging it when they did add it.
1 month ago on May 12th, 2009 at 10:25 pm | Permalink
Had a quick play with this OSX port of Paul’s Extreme Sound Stretch and, while the interface is a little rough, it seems stable and the ability to stretch a sample of a few seconds in length into literally hours of sound is fascinating. It’s a fun process listening back to the stretched versions and picking out interesting bits for use elsewhere, too.
I’ll gloss over the radio silence around these parts recently, if you don’t mind, since “normal service now resumes” posts are, for the most part, tedious. Suffice it to say that I’ve had a slightly difficult couple of weeks.
As for progress, I have one new song 99.5% written (I literally need to fix the tune for the last line) and am battling an unduly complex arrangement and trying to get the vocal right because the tune is, I now realise, incredibly hard to sing. This one’s called “Last trains,” alluded to previously.
I also have a polite little ditty called “Baby steps” that is written—I think—but may need the key bumping up a notch from the demo and a bit of arrangement work. This one, finally, is the “use all the old analogue gear” approach that I originally started out with; it’s mostly played on a Roland RS-09, SH-101, x0xb0x and MFB 503. I was listening to The Smiths again recently and thinking on the fact that some of their songs were better for not overextending a simple idea, so “Baby steps” is essentially two verses, a chorus and an outro. The “I think” above is because I can’t hear the outro in my head yet, and I want to have an idea before I start noodling away.
From next week things should assume a more level course, so the pace at which I’m able to finish and upload stuff should pick up rapidly. As will, no doubt, the twittering and tumbling and audiobooing. Bear with me.
1 month ago on May 11th, 2009 at 5:45 pm | Permalink
Ironic that I should have watched this at about the same time the iTunes Store premium pricing came in. As Reznor notes, you can pretty much get any item of music for free these days on the web. Demand elasticity is no longer predictable, it’s infinite. Unlimited downside if you’re unlucky, or greedy, enough to put prices up beyond what people are willing to pay. Break the business model. Go ahead.
TR also gives some thoughtful advice for bands starting out and attempting to go the NIN route. Nothing earthshattering, but at this point he’s probably the most successful person to have played the game in all its permutations; so whereas coming from other people these might be useful suggestions, from him you suspect they’re backed up by science; that is, trying lots of stuff and seeing what works.
2 months ago on April 9th, 2009 at 12:13 pm | Permalink
Can I just say that this, if it works as advertised, induces in me a severe case of gadget need? The idea of playing live alone with a laptop thrills me about as much as it probably would an audience, and I’ve been trying to rough out setups that involve something more — and this is perfect, in that it crams mixer, recorder and effects into something small enough to schlep in addition to, say, a smallish synth or two. Pluperfect, in that you can even eliminate the laptop. Await news of pricing with interest.
…but you definitely don’t want the one I have. After a day of endurance, 24 hours’ sleep and another day of endurance, I am now coughing sporadically, cannot breathe through my nose, am seeing double and feel that slight sense of unreality you get when your body temp is out of whack.
Have written half of two new songs in the midst of this, but cannot sing worth shit. So a bit more time before anything gets recorded. Sigh.
3 months ago on April 1st, 2009 at 6:25 pm | Permalink
Mentioned this briefly on Twitter, and it’s by no means recent, but I thought it was worth a repost here as I found it immediately motivated me to get deeper into Quartz Composer. In short, it epitomises what a tutorial should be—it quickly allows you to do something cool that both gives a hint of what further possibilities lie ahead, and is worth showing off to people. In this case, creating a rotating, lighted cube that changes height in response to audio input.
3 months ago on March 29th, 2009 at 9:16 pm | Permalink